Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
1.
Influenza Other Respir Viruses ; 17(2): e13093, 2023 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2266808

ABSTRACT

Background: The antigenicity of SARS-CoV-2 is a critical issue for the effectiveness of the vaccine, and thus, it should be phenotypically evaluated by serological assays as new field isolates emerge. The hemagglutination/hemagglutination inhibition (HA/HI) tests are well known as a representative method for antigenic analysis of influenza viruses, but SARS-CoV-2 does not agglutinate human or guinea pig red blood cells. Therefore, the antigenic analysis requires complicated cell-based assays using special equipment such as plate reader or ELISPOT analyzer. Methods: Based on the HA/HI tests for influenza viruses, we developed the particle agglutination/particle agglutination inhibition (PA/PAI) test to easily and rapidly quantify the virus and antibody using human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (hACE2)-bound latex beads. The virus titers were determined by mixing the beads and the virus from culture supernatant, settling it overnight, and then observing the sedimentation/agglutination pattern (PA test). The neutralization antibody titers were determined by mixing virus-infected hamster antisera in addition to the beads and virus (PAI test). Results: The PA titer was positively correlated with the plaque-forming units. The PAI titer using the hamster antisera clearly revealed the antigenic difference between the omicron and previous variants. The antigenic differences were supported by the results shown in other methods. Conclusions: The PAI test is an easy and rapid method to analyze the antigenicity of SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Orthomyxoviridae , Animals , Humans , Guinea Pigs , SARS-CoV-2 , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Agglutination , Immune Sera , Hemagglutinin Glycoproteins, Influenza Virus
2.
Microbiol Immunol ; 66(7): 361-370, 2022 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1968039

ABSTRACT

The practical use of cell-based seasonal influenza vaccines is currently being considered in Japan. From the perspective of adventitious virus contamination, we assessed the suitability of NIID-MDCK cells (NIID-MDCK-Cs) as a safe substrate for the isolation of influenza viruses from clinical specimens. We first established a sensitive multiplex real-time PCR system to screen for 27 respiratory viruses and used it on 34 virus samples that were isolated by passaging influenza-positive clinical specimens in NIID-MDCK-Cs. Incidentally, the limit of detection (LOD) of the system was 100 or fewer genome copies per reaction. In addition to influenza viruses, human enterovirus 68 (HEV-D68) genomes were detected in two samples after two or three passages in NIID-MDCK-Cs. To further investigate the susceptibility of NIID-MDCK-Cs to adventitious viruses, eight common respiratory viruses were subjected to passages in NIID-MDCK-Cs. The genome copy numbers of seven viruses other than parainfluenza 3 decreased below the LOD by passage 4. By passaging in NIID-MDCK-Cs, the genome numbers of the input HEV-D68, 1 × 108 copies, declined to 102 at passage 3 and to under the LOD at passage 4, whereas those of the other six viruses were under the LOD by passage 3. These results implied that during the process of isolating influenza viruses with NIID-MDCK-Cs, contaminating viruses other than parainfluenza 3 can be efficiently removed by passages in NIID-MDCK-Cs. NIID-MDCK-Cs could be a safe substrate for isolating influenza viruses that can be used to develop cell-based influenza vaccine candidate viruses.


Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Orthomyxoviridae , Paramyxoviridae Infections , Viruses , Animals , Dogs , Humans , Influenza Vaccines/genetics , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Madin Darby Canine Kidney Cells , Vaccine Development , Virus Cultivation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL